Journal article
C. Mulder, C. Erkens, P. Kouw, E. Huisman, Wieneke Meijer-Veldman, M. Borgdorff, F. van Leth
European Journal of Public Health, 2012
European Journal of Public Health, 2012
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Mulder, C., Erkens, C., Kouw, P., Huisman, E., Meijer-Veldman, W., Borgdorff, M., & van Leth, F. (2012). Missed opportunities in tuberculosis control in The Netherlands due to prioritization of contact investigations. European Journal of Public Health.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Mulder, C., C. Erkens, P. Kouw, E. Huisman, Wieneke Meijer-Veldman, M. Borgdorff, and F. van Leth. “Missed Opportunities in Tuberculosis Control in The Netherlands Due to Prioritization of Contact Investigations.” European Journal of Public Health (2012).
MLA
Click to copy
Mulder, C., et al. “Missed Opportunities in Tuberculosis Control in The Netherlands Due to Prioritization of Contact Investigations.” European Journal of Public Health, 2012.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{c2012a,
title = {Missed opportunities in tuberculosis control in The Netherlands due to prioritization of contact investigations.},
year = {2012},
journal = {European Journal of Public Health},
author = {Mulder, C. and Erkens, C. and Kouw, P. and Huisman, E. and Meijer-Veldman, Wieneke and Borgdorff, M. and van Leth, F.}
}
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Dutch contact investigation guidelines stipulate that Public Health Services should examine contacts around all pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients to prevent disease and further transmission. Our objective was to assess to what extent these guidelines were applied and whether patient characteristics were associated with having contacts investigated.
METHODS We extracted the records of all reported pulmonary TB patients from the nationwide surveillance register covering 2006-07. Patient characteristics associated with having contacts investigated were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS Out of the 1236 pulmonary TB patients reported, 909 (74%) patients were eligible for analysis, since 133 (11%) patients had incomplete records and 194 (16%) patients were registered by Public Health Services who did not report contact investigation results. For 710 (78%) out of the 909 patients contacts were investigated. Compared with Dutch patients, contacts were significantly less often investigated around immigrant patients (84 vs. 75%, OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.40-0.92). Contacts were significantly more often investigated for smear positive patients (OR: 3.52; 95% CI: 2.23-5.55) and culture positive patients (OR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.76-4.16), compared with smear negative and culture negative patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION Initiating contact investigations appear to be prioritized based on the infectiousness, but also on the ethnicity of pulmonary TB patients. By not investigating the contacts of 25% of the immigrant patients, there is a risk of missing a significant number of infected and diseased contacts, since the incidence in this group is markedly higher than in the Dutch population.